SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: EQ 1/7/2009 11:44:21 AM
3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 42834
 
Honeys blagojevich breaks major Brinker boo-boo news!

Honey stated the following:

Who would actually subscribe to a newsletter called Marketimer if they knew going in that it had lost over 40% on it stock portfolios the year before?

Based on information that I have archived from Brinker's website over time, I am able to compute the dollar values that the portfolios lost last year. The Vanguard Total Stock Market Fund (VTSMX) and the Vanguard S&P 500 fund (VFINX) both lost less than Brinker's Model Portfolio I and Portfolio II. Portfolio III did better, but it is a balanced portfolio.

PORTFOLIO I DOLLAR VALUE

December 31, 2007: $283,874
December 31, 2008: $171,153
Loss for year: $112,721
Loss from October 2007 [high of $302,561]: $131,408

PORTFOLIO II DOLLAR VALUE

December 31, 2007: $229,074
December 31, 2008: $143,294
Loss for year: $85,780
Loss from October 2007 [high of $241,994]: $98,700

PORTFOLIO III DOLLAR VALUE

December 31, 2007: $213,493
December 31, 2008: $162,563
Loss for year: $50,930
Loss from October 2007 [high of $219,263]: $56,700

______________________________________________________

EQ asks several questions:

1) Honey, you said Based on information that I have archived from Brinker's website over time, I am able to compute the dollar values that the portfolios lost last year. Could you give us a bit more insight into the processes you utilised?

2) Honey, you said Who would actually subscribe to a newsletter called Marketimer if they knew going in that it had lost over 40% on it stock portfolios the year before?

Honey, did Kirk help you on your lost over 40% computation? The reason I ask is that (using YOUR figures) I am unable to calculate any losses exceeding 40%.

Here are my computations (based on YOUR figures:

PORTFOLIO I DOLLAR VALUE

December 31, 2007: $283,874
December 31, 2008: $171,153
Loss for year: $112,721
Percentage Loss for Year: -39.71%

PORTFOLIO II DOLLAR VALUE

December 31, 2007: $229,074
December 31, 2008: $143,294
Loss for year: $85,780
Loss from October 2007 [high of $241,994]: $98,700
Percentage Loss for Year: -37.45%

PORTFOLIO III DOLLAR VALUE

December 31, 2007: $213,493
December 31, 2008: $162,563
Loss for year: $50,930
Loss from October 2007 [high of $219,263]: $56,700
Percentage Loss for Year: -23.86%

Conclusion: (based on YOUR figures) ALL of Bobs portfolios came in with LESS than a 40% loss, and are fairly in-line with and reflective of the state of the market during 2008.

Honey, no one wants to lose money in the market, but lets not say things that erroneously make the losses appear worse than they are.

Cheerio!

Elan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext