SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (31440)1/13/2009 6:42:12 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 

(If, if, if....)


Either part time people were counted as unemployed, or they are not. Either way the boundary between part time and full time isn't relative to the question "Are part time people counted as employed".

As I said before - "Where the dividing line between the two is, isn't very relevant to the issues being discussed - Whether part time people where counted as unemployed, and whether the article said that part time people where counted as unemployed.

Returning to that issue - They definitely are counted as employed now. (Well they are counted the same as the unemployed under U-6, but that's not the headline "unemployment rate", nor an actual count or estimate of people who are unemployed.)

Part time employees are not unemployed by the definition of the word unemployed.

Of course governments have been known to include nonsense in their stats from time to time, but you would think that if they wanted to distort the stats they wouldn't do so in a way that was obviously wrong, and at the same time made the unemployment rate seem higher. But you never know, they could have done such a weird thing, but I've never seen a shred of evidence that they have, and I've looked for it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext