SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (177680)1/18/2009 12:23:07 PM
From: James HuttonRead Replies (3) of 306849
 
Ok, so the best fact you can provide is that Bill Clinton fabricated a new economy or productivity miracle (that didn't exist) by knowing it was happening and allowing it. And now you say that Bill Clinton didn't really "usher" ("usher" is a verb that means to precede and introduce) this period in (as you said at least once or twice before) or fabricate it, because Reagan had some culpability.

OK. Thanks for explaining.

"i don't believe anyone *wanted* to leverage 35-1 until *after* bill clinton's bubble economy was instituted . . ."

You're right. All Wall Street traders and IBs hated margin and shunned any use of leverage until Bill Clinton (a/k/a Svengali) ginned up an economy that later forced the SEC to change the net capital requirements, which forced IBs to max out their leverage against their better judgment. I remember the quote from one IB trader, "That SOB Cox has loosened capital requirements. Here I've been trying to make a seven figure bonus living on just putting up 1/10 of my firm's money. Now I have to try for eight figures and can only put up 1/35 or 1/40 equity, and that sucks. How can I perform my job under these conditions? It's all Bill Clinton's fault."

So once again you're right.



Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext