SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marcos who wrote (62921)1/18/2009 4:05:44 PM
From: tyc:>  Read Replies (1) of 78426
 
>> "...sort of coming around to Claude's view on this"

Me too, Marcos (believe it or not ). But let's be clear on what Claude's view IS. I think he has made it clear that he expects copper to fall before it climbs to the astronomical heights forecast by Schulich (sp?). In other words extreme volatility.

Let's face it, in the present circumstances we should be grateful that neither New Afton nor La Fortuna nor Mt Milligan are currently in production. They are truly "warrants" on the future volatile price of copper. I see MtM and TRX as the better priced warrant, especially when you consider what TRX will represent after (if?) Goldcorp exercises its option for a 60% participating interest in MT M.

Even that Brook Hunt article that was so bearish on future copper prices foresaw higher prices coming first "as an opportunity to hedge against a future decline". TRX has no copper production to hedge, but Goldcorp does in its Alumbrera production. Such a hedge would serve to gurantee the profitability of its Mt.M participation. (If such a hedge should be considered necessary).

I note that NGD bought (back) some of its "junk-" bonds ! It's surprising that it has nothing better to do with its hard-to-replace cash.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext