SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Canadian Options

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zardoz who wrote (710)10/23/1997 8:45:00 PM
From: Porter Davis  Read Replies (2) of 1598
 
Options update for 23 October...I couldn't make this up if I wanted to

If any of you wonder why I rant and rave and carry on like I do about somewhat technical matters you should consider for a moment the opening on NTL on the TSE today. OK...S&P futures down the 15 point limit pre-opening, the market looking like a sewer...NTL indicated to open at $130.50 Cdn, last close $135.50. With me so far? A severe drop, but not out of line. Well, at the *last* instant, a broker entered an order to buy 25,000 NTL at the market. (Whether or not it was an attempt to 'scoop', I don't know, but I strongly suspect so.) So, the TSE system (remember, an order-driven system) performed its job exactly as it was programmed to--it found the level at which buyers and sellers were matched and voila!...NTL opened at $135.60!!!Please re-read that last sentence so you understand exactly what happened. NTL opened *up* .10c. Meanwhile, it opened on the NYSE at the equivalent of $130.80. (You remember the NYSE...that's where they have human beings that can think and react and make competent decisions). So, what does the TSE do? According to their lights, the system performed perfectly by matching up buyers and sellers at the price that filled all orders, but...there was the embarrassing $5 discrepancy. Hmmm, what to do? On the one hand, you can't admit your system fucked up, but on the other hand, it was a 1.25 million difference of opinion. So after some head-scratching and a cup of coffee, it was decided by the heavy thinkers at Market Integrity (no oxymoron intended) to *deus ex machina* change the opening price to $131.40. People, you can't have it both ways. Either you commit to an order-driven trading system (as the TSE has) or you rely on professionals who are accountable to line up orders and ensure a fair price. (By the way, a similar opening occurred in ABX yesterday, but it was only .50c on 10,000, so the client only got screwed for $5000 so I didn't bring it up). I sincerely hope someone who got a report that they sold NTL at $135.60 on the opening today and later had it changed to $131.40 sues the TSE. Someone has to make these clowns sit up and smell the coffee.

You might ask what this has to do with options. Fair question. The TSE is planning to bring an 'order-driven' system in when fully automating derivatives in Toronto. If this shit can happen in NTL, and as I posted a few days ago, in BCE, two of the most heavily-traded and followed stocks in Canada, what will happen to a market order to buy Bell November 32.50 puts? Remember, we can't prevent anomolous (read: fucked up) trades from occurring. Then we have to wait and see if the TSE comes in and re-prices them? Don't make me laugh. I didn't grow up wanting to be a Nintendo trader like in Milan or Stockholm or Sarajevo. I entered this profession to be a pro trader like my father and grandfather in an open, visible market. Do we make money? Yes. Do we lose money? Definitely yes. But we stand behind our markets and we can reason and think and react...something no computer can do.

It's time people stood up and told the TSE that enough is enough. If the spirit moves you, call Susan Crocker at the TSE or Andrew Willis at the Globe&Mail or the OSC or your broker. Tell them you're tired of being jerked around. They think they can get away with it. It's up to you to tell them they can't. I've done all I can. I'm tired.

Happy trading.

Porter
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext