SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 176.75-1.4%11:46 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: engineer who wrote (82652)1/19/2009 3:11:16 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 196971
 
Can BRCM bring the case again, this time including the downstream users? Not being a lawyer, I can only conjecture, but there is something called "res judicata," meaning that the matter has already been adjudicated. In other words, if BRCM had modified its original complaint, before a decision had been made in court, then it might have had a case, but not now.

If the above reasoning is true, then some of the QCOM customers, such as Verizon, might be able to obtain royalty refunds from BRCM. And if BRCM refused to negotiate on this point, well, if I were Verizon and others, I'd think twice about doing any further business with them.

This ruling, however, also shows how QCOM mismanaged its litigation initially and on appeal. They wasted a lot of shareholders assets pursuing a case that was flawed from square one, or at least from not having made their objections in a timely fashion, which might as well be square one.

Art
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext