SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kirk © who wrote (42271)1/19/2009 8:06:32 PM
From: octavian4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 42834
 
kirk said:

<<DO YOU ADMIT YOU GOT CAUGHT LYING AND NAME CALLING TWICE BELOW?>>

--Lying? Of course not. I have never lied on a public message board. Name calling? I plead guilty. I will let others judge whether the name I called you is accurate:

What "personal attacks" did I resort to? Are you referring to me calling you a scumbag because of your hypocritical "free discussion" board which is NOT free, your Bob Brinker Fan Club which is NOT a fan club, or your Bob Brinker Testimonials Board which is NOT a testimonials board? If that is what you are referring to, then I stand by my words. I wouldn't call that a "personal attack," but an accurate description of a hypocrite who purposely misnamed 3 anti-brinker hate boards that are full of propaganda. Scumbag is actually too kind!
-- dija/Octavian

--I STILL stand by those words!

Dija Caught Lying by Will/cheat insults us both:

Dija Lie:As you know, I do NOT call him a miscreant".

Will/cheat said: "You know you did. Why LIE? Calling people dishonest while you are lying through your teeth about matters of record will get you in trouble every time."

Dija Reply when caught: --Fish has been right all along--you are a complete and total piece of $hit. A scumbag of the first order--right up there with kirk lindstrom. "

--I also stand by those words. They were very accurate. Will/cheat was twisting the truth in a most malicious way to accuse me of lying when he KNEW BEYOND DOUBT THAT IT WAS NOT A TRUE LIE.

For those who don't remember, I once did call brinker a miscreant. I later retracted it (after learning it was a worse pejorative than I had thought. I don't think Bob is a very nice guy, but "miscreant" is too severe a term).

So when I said I "do not call him a miscreant," (I used present tense--I did not say I had never called him that) Will KNEW that it was essentially true, because he knew I had retracted that statement and admitted I had made an error.

Yet he called me a liar when--and there is NO DOUBT of this--he knew the whole story.

Even now, kirk knows the whole story, and yet he throws this up as an example of one of my supposed lies!

What does THAT tell you about how hard it is for kirk to find examples!?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext