RAMBUS (Nasdaq: RMBS) - THE EAGLE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : RAMBUS (Nasdaq: RMBS) - THE EAGLE

RMBS 113.89

-6.3%

Jan 30 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: Paul Lee	1/21/2009 11:18:40 AM
	of 2039

Author: seat48onthebus send pm · add member to favs · ignore · recommend view thread, thread start In response to msg 324610 by Cocomojo Recs: 43 Re: What else of major significance does JW have to rule on>>>>> Anytime Ruling - HJW’s verdict(s) on mfgs. equitable claims / defenses Anytime Ruling – HJW’s ruling on the USPTO exams. Wait or forge ahead Anytime Ruling - HJW’s ruling to include all DRAM designs due to Hynix’ pre-trial stipulation Anytime Ruling – HJW’S on Hynix’ motion to exclude the deposition of Sharon Holt wrt. damages Anytime Ruling - HJW’s ruling to include Hynix’ Oregon fab to damages Anytime Ruling - HJW’s ruling to determine the royalty rate from 2006 forward (4.5–10%) Anytime Ruling - HJW determines $ + interest (est. 400-500 mil.) Hynix needs a bond if appealed Anytime Ruling - HJW’s certification of the trial results Anytime Ruling - HJW’s Injunction ruling Anytime Ruling – HJW’s ruling on stay Anytime Ruling-HJW on Samsung claims 1 ----Samsung claims to have a right to the Infineon royalty rate forever 2-----Samsung wants to recalculate the Infineon lump sum payment to a running royalty rate 3 ----Samsung claims their contract was improperly voided (Sam blocked a controller audit) 7a -- Samsung claims 17200 unfair business practice due to spoliation by Rambus 10a - Samsung claims time limitation on damages – 6 years before the complaint 10b - Samsung claims limitation on damages + remedy due to marking and notice Anytime Ruling – HJW on Samsung’s claim Rambus negotiated in bad faith Anytime Ruling – HJW on Piercing Samsung Atty-Client Privilege due to Shim testimony Anytime Ruling - HJW on Samsung’s spoliation claim (wrt Rambus’ anticipation of litigation) Anytime Ruling - HJW ruling on Rambus Affirmative Defenses (including Samsung spoliation) Anytime HJW rulings on dispositive (Daubert) motions and Motions for SJ Mfg.’s affirmative defense --- patent exhaustion Mfg.’s cross motion --- to stop Teece testimony re: 2000 licenses Mfg’s SJ motions 5,6,7 of No Willfulness Samsung SJ motion #12 --- for non-infringement of method claims Nanya withdrew SJ motion #3 --- for non-infringement of method claims Rambus SJ motion --- Micron’s license defense Rambus SJ motion --- Micron’s lack of standing defense Rambus SJ motion --- of no inequitable conduct

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next