2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 374.27

-0.2%

Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Seeker of Truth who wrote (45609)	1/22/2009 3:39:27 AM
From: Maurice Winn	5 Recommendations Read Replies (3) of 217996

TruthSeeker your anti-Jewish tirade is unacceptable: < Obama isn't perfect; it's unacceptable that a majority of the Palestine Arabs are denied the possibility of returning to the land which their ancestors lived in for about 17 centuries. I suppose that he wouldn't have won the election if he had not made some compromises. This is a big one and of course will mean the continued murder of Arabs by Zionists as well as the murder of Zionists by Arabs. Nobody persecutes Jews in the US but many seem to prefer living in dangerous places. > Living somewhere doesn't automatically confer rights to the land. For example, Hong Kong was leased to Great Britain aka The Crown for about a century. When the lease was up, it was time to go. Time to politely fold the flag and call it a day. Similarly, in Fiji, Indians had gone there a century before, lived on land for 100 years, but it wasn't theirs. The local yokels decided they wanted it back. Bad luck for the great great grandchildren on having to leave "their" ancestral land. Same for Palestine. The Ottoman landlords sold the land on which Palestinians were paying a pitiful rent. Too bad that they had lived there for generations. The owners sold. Then the British took over from the Ottomans and carved the place up as rulers do. Then after WWII, the UN decided Israel was a good idea. Arabs didn't like the idea and started a war they lost. Whining about losing the war and demanding the land back is silly. The Arabs could stop the murdering tomorrow, by the simple expedient of stopping murdering. If they don't murder, they will find the Israelis won't respond. It's noteworthy that you put it the other way around as though the Israelis invaded Gaza so the long-suffering Palestinians responded. I notice you didn't mention the hordes of Jews who were murdered in pogroms and forced off their land around the Arab world. Did you forget that? Do Jews get a right of return and compensation? Jews were okay in NZ, but the Peretz family left Mangere Bridge in the 1960s to live in Israel. Fair enough too. You are wrong to assume that Obama compromised on what he really thinks about Israel to win the election. It's quite possible that he is simply not in favour of murderous Moslems murdering Jews. I doubt that Israel is particularly dangerous. The murder rate in New Orleans is more lethal than the murder rate in Israel. If Iran got nukes it would be different. [laughably they pretend that they just want electricity and the ignorant and gullible believe them]. For now, Israel seems quite safe. Have you watched Fitna? You should. video.google.com Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next