William, William, William..... OFF TOPIC ---
<<<< If you were that good looking, you wouldn't be spending so much time online chatting. You're a real talker >>>
I really don't understand. Are you saying "good looking" folks do not spend time online chatting??? I think you ought to ask Rosemary about that --- she & I have spent a LOT of time chatting. And I think that lisa, Rosemary, and I do fit into the "good looking" category.
<<< You talk 3 times as much as David and I, and I don't think it's just because you're a woman (although that's a good possibility :-). Only Rosemary beats you by a little bit, and she's a real chatterbox! >>>>
Well, let's see. First of all, I guess you are confirming that you are not a woman --- as some of us already knew.
Secondly, I will take issue with your comment that lisa talks 3 times as much as me. You are just looking at the number of posts to SI. But what about the other three tools that I use to chat --- ICQ, PowWow, and the ichat plugin. Sheesh!!! William, I think I've got about 100 folks in my ICQ list.
Isn't that right, Rosemary? DirectJohn? jb3? (and that's just to name 3 people who use to be regular posters on this thread).
Okay, enough of this non-sense. I've already used too much time posting here. I've got to finish this Consultant Report.
See you later, William.
David
PS --- oh, BTW, and what's being a woman got to do with chatting? I have several male friends and all of us can keep or exceed the chatting pace set by our female online friends on some days. I'd say "chatting" is split about 50/50 on the gender basis. |
