Honeybee wrote:
"Instead of replying to my response to him here, this 'fine gentleman' posted his reply to me at the Savant
Sewer site."
Instead of replying to my response to her here, this "fine lady" posted her reply to me at her Google sewer site.
(I use that word "sewer" because there is just as much or more trash-talking of other people there than there is here, although most of it is from her and her board manager.)
"He knows any smarmy little word-parsing being nasty to me is good for at least 3 or 4 recs from the Brinker-arse-kissers there."
Oh yeah, like recs are SOOOOO important, LOL!
The truth is that I prefer sites that are not controlled by one side or the other. I replied to a post ON an SI board ABOUT an SI board. She is the one who came up with the idea of cross-posting on another Web site. When I saw her doing that, I thought, "OK, why not?"
"And he knows I won't respond to him there..."
Post wherever you like.
"...so he can 'safely' do this sort of thing there ..."
There is no "danger."
"...whereas, over here, I make him look like a fool every time he opens his mouth."
If it makes you feel better to think that, go ahead.
"His agenda is very clear in this post. He gives it away completely in his last sentence. He wants to discredit my Silicon Investor Brinker Thread by (trying) to turn people against me."
My only agenda is to post the truth as I see it.
"As I said, he's a 'really FINE gentleman,' he can't help if he's pea-green with envy.>>>"
If I cared that much about having a thread with my screen-name at the top, I would spend a lot more time posting there.
Brinker has been accused of trying to control criticism of him on the Web. Who does that remind you of? |
