SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Dierks who wrote (30288)2/2/2009 11:43:44 AM
From: pompsander1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Gee....the State of Hawaii says they have a valid birth certificate. Rule of Law. There is no issue.

I, too, read all the material you posted (in fact, read it months ago). Still don't understand why your partisan shills outweigh the partisan shills on the other side.

Why not just defer to the declarations made by the officals entrusted with the legal duty to maintain offical records for a sovereign state of the United States?

I still think George W. Bush was replaced by a doppelganger back in 1983. How could he have cleaned up so well otherwise? I want a DNA sample from both parents and the guy living in Texas now. If I don't get it, then I don't have to obey anything he did while President. I mean, how stupid is that?

This whole thing is as silly as the democrats who refused to recognize Bush as President back in 2000 because the SC was in the bag for the republicans.

What was the phrase so common back then: "get over it".

What is the point of the argument. The State of Hawaii is the only entity with standing and they have no problem whatsoever with what their records show.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext