The balance of power between US and Iran has now OFFICIALLY changed.
Whereas, a month ago, the United States was dictating the terms of any discussions, we now have Iran calling the shots. "If you want to talk with Iran, here are our preconditions."
This is what happens when you put weak Dems in charge of foreign policy. In the course of less than a month they have managed to totally f*ck it up.
==========================================================
Iran says US must accept nuclear programme
By Roula Khalaf and Najmeh Bozorgmehr in Tehran
Published: February 4 2009 18:48 | Last updated: February 4 2009 18:48
A senior adviser to Iran’s president says dialogue with the US will succeed only if the Obama administration accepts Tehran’s right to have a nuclear programme.
Mojtaba Samareh-Hashemi, right-hand man to Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, the fundamentalist president, said, in an interview with the Financial Times, Tehran was studying its options, just as the new US administration was reviewing its Iran policy.
The US hopes to engage with Iran and persuade the country to halt its uranium enrichment activities, the most sensitive part of the nuclear programme, and withdraw its support for militant groups in the region.
The launch of a homemade Iranian satellite on Tuesday further raised concerns among western powers that Iran was accelerating its development of ballistic missile technology.
But Iran too has a list of demands requiring US policy shifts.
On some issues – such as the removal of US troops from Iraq and stabilising Afghanistan – Iran and the US can find common ground.
Others, particularly Iran’s claim that its nuclear programme is peaceful in nature and so advanced that it has become a fact on the ground, could prove the two sides’ differences are irreconcilable.
“If [US] policies change the two nations will get closer to each other, the two governments will get closer to each other and the chances for dialogue and co-operation will succeed,” said Mr Samareh.
“The policy of [George W.] Bush was to use this [the nuclear issue] as an excuse to stand up against the Iranian nation.
“For there to be change, this policy has to change.” In Afghanistan, he said, Iran was expecting a more robust effort to fight opium production.
Another big concern for Tehran were US attempts to negotiate with elements of the Taliban, the radical Sunni group ousted from power and seen by Tehran as a security threat.
“When the US goes into Afghanistan under the pretext of fighting illegal groups how can it enter into negotiations with them?” said Mr Samareh.
He also pointed to the Bush administration’s support for Israel during conflicts such as the offensive in Gaza against Hamas, which is supported by Iran, and the 2006 Israeli war against Hizbollah, another Iran-backed group.
In both cases the US sought to delay the passing of a UN ceasefire resolution.
“Is the new US administration going to continue these policies? If it does, then nothing will change,” he said.
While the US last week sent envoy George Mitchell to discuss Gaza with leaders in the region, including Mahmoud Abbas, head of the Palestinian Authority, which Hamas ousted from Gaza two years ago, Iran hosted Khaled Meshaal, the Hamas leader, in Tehran this week.
Nato called last week for greater efforts to involve Iran in resolving Afghan issues.
Mr Samareh shrugged off the debate in Washington over whether the Obama administration should engage with the government of Mr Ahmadi-Nejad, which could lend him credibility, or try to bypass him by seeking direct contact with the supreme leader and final decision-maker, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
“The leadership system is unified, with each one having their own responsibilities and when the government makes a decision it means it’s the decision of the whole system,” he said.
He has sat down on more than one occasion with former American officials, although Mr Samareh insists that recent reports of negotiations with William Perry, former defence secretary were overblown.
Mr Samareh said he had taken part in discussions held in Europe with western experts and academics, which included Mr Perry but they were neither official, nor were they negotiating sessions.
Western officials say pressure will intensify on Tehran to compromise, as financial sanctions, designed to force Iran to suspend uranium enrichment, bite harder in a climate of lower oil prices.
Although Iranian business has suffered from the restrictions imposed by the US and the UN, record oil revenues have cushioned their impact.
Mr Samareh, however, played down the impact of sanctions, saying the financial sector’s isolation had, in effect, helped shield it from the global financial crisis.
The government was hoping to counter lower oil revenues by restructuring subsidies and curbing current expenditures, he said.
Inflation, meanwhile, which had reached more than 25 per cent, was on its way down, and housing prices were coming down, all of which was, he claimed, leading to “economic enthusiasm”. |
