SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The DD Maven
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: shortsinthesand who wrote (596)2/5/2009 8:05:24 AM
From: rrufff1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 736
 
re SGLS - I don't profess to know anything about it other than what I put together from a quick perusal of the last filing and a quick look at the board. From that, my opinion of "scam" was quickly formed.

What I don't understand is the effort to portray LBWR as a scam while there is less of an effort on SGLS and, in fact, I saw one poster posting positively on it, who was quickly jumping on the bandwagon with respect to LBWR being a scam.

I'm not defending LBWR here and have expressed myself objectively (both positively and negatively) on this site with respect to the mistakes made by LBWR, but the volume is minimal and seems to pale in comparison to a stock such as SGLS, on an objective "scam meter." Again, I'll repeat, as some like to take my posts out of context. I'm not attacking those who are critical of LBWR or even their arguments, just wondering why it receives more attention than the MOMO scams that seem to be so pervasive on the pink sheets, and which attract so much attention on IHub.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News