SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (103214)2/5/2009 12:24:19 PM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (1) of 542080
 
John;

That's my point.

We had a good argument here recently between Lane and myself as to what constitutes a "stimulus". I think that the "nonsense" author is making that point when he argues between the two philosophies of just spending money to get it in the system or spending money and accomplishing the creation of jobs and getting a return for the tax payer. Why is that not a valid question? What is nonsense about that?

Any "economist" who thinks this "choice" accurately reflects the debate among economists today simply doesn't deserve whatever doctorate he/she received.

John, this is the debate. Kugman and Ben Stein are saying get the money into the system anyway we can - dig the holes and fill them is. Build houses on one end of the development while we bull doze them on the other. Return to the old way.

I and others are saying that this can't be done. So instead of digging that hole (building another house), move these workers into something that needs to be done - build a bridge, a tunnel, a transit system, repair dams, the list is almost endless. That is a real difference. A difference between Krugman and what Americas in middle America really want.

AND, it is not nonsense at all. It is a debate Americans deserve.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext