SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: anializer who wrote (33448)2/5/2009 7:37:49 PM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (1) of 78644
 
ULTR. Well, that's four of us here for this one. That's an unusually high number.

When I ran the analysis a few years ago, it turned out to be a good sign if three (or more)posters here bought and posted here about it. (Such stocks moved up subsequently-- within 12 months.) Actually, if I recall correctly, three people were better for the stock than if four people were buying. There weren't that many four-people buys though to be significant. And the survey had other flaws too.
It did give an indication though - some support - that a stock could really be undervalued if several people who used different types of value analyses all concluded the same.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News