Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 230.92

+3.1%

Nov 24 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (9433)	10/24/1997 1:05:00 PM
From: John E. Rylander	Read Replies (1) of 70976

Brian I think it would be good for lawyers, but probably not for us. Firms, even good firms, just wouldn't release findings then. What they -should- do to really come clean, though, is to offer a price at which they think it's a buy. Then folks could track their purchases (to the extent they're disclosed in a timely fashion -- you guys know the laws on this better than I) and see if they're hypocrites, liars, both, or neither. Any security lawyers out there know just what accountability is already in place? I mean, is it legal to lie about these things? What about having one contrarian on your staff whose results are the only ones released (so that -he's- telling the truth, even while the firm lies, basically)? --John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next