SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Koligman who wrote (6086)2/12/2009 1:01:38 PM
From: TimF   of 42652
 
"The system hasn't worked" is a bit too much of an absolute. Arguably the system hasn't worked extremely well, or as well as in some other places, or as well as it could, but even if we accept one or more of those points, it doesn't necessarily mean that after massive changes things would be better, or that the specific massive change we should go for is to remove profit.

Even going all the way to "removing profit from health care insurance will make the system work better" (a highly questionable assumption IMO, but I'll go with it for the rest of this post), wouldn't make removing profit the goal, but rather a means to a goal. It it was the goal, that would mean you want it for itself, perhaps even if it made the system work much worse.

and healthcare IMO should be a right...

I strongly object to that idea, or the idea that any requirement that someone must do something for you, or pay someone else to do it, can properly be a right.

Message 24204755
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News