Its connected to my many prior posts here that stated that the officers of Maxam, based on the communication to Maxam shareholders in regards to the " Commercialization of the Xcentia/Maxam Process" referenced many times in official Maxam news releases, that they may not have properly protected the intellectual property of Maxam demanded by law as pertains to they position in this public company.
Please reference:
Message 24297467
Which contains:
[Start.]
My "bashing" is an outrage that President Steeves will not be accountable for the March 6, 2006
update on the commercialization of the Xcentia/Maxam process.
I'll repeat from my recent post of
Message 24277655
"It seems President Steeves has knowledge that needs to be kept secret so that shareholders
will not discover his incompetence and/or criminal activity most likely with Xcentia."
Gold or no gold, I'm gonna investigate him.
Doug
[Stop.]
Its clear to Maxam's shareholders that they have been kept , and thusly now are, "in the dark" as to the status of the above mentioned intellectual property of Maxam developed from the sale of common shares to fund such research to put Maxam onto a pathway for revenue and company health.
Any possible future investigation taken into the collorabation and transfer of IP by Maxam to Xcentia or any other entity not disclosed by Maxam via news releases to its shareholders, will have a paper trail that will allow a "next step" investigation of scientific and engineering disciplines to highlight aspects of possible IP of Maxam being deemed "a failure" but in reality "a success" and used without due procedures of accountability of ownership.
Its clear any such investigations mentioned above would be unnecessary and futile if Maxam would disclosed the status that determines the above mentioned IP of Maxam herein discussed is worthless and has not been recklessly handled.
To make clear, no determination of wrong doing or misconduction in regards to Maxam's IP can be made in the current nondiscloser by Maxam of its IP status, and could only be done if Maxam releases the information to its shareholders, or if Maxam refuses, then only if an outside "observation" is conducted of which is an unfortunity event(s) not desidered.
As a side note, I did suggest in a post on this board using:
Invent Resources, Inc.
weinvent.com
... to meet your intellectual property, patent and new product needs.
... we have guided the development of [products] and [formed] licensing arrangements
... [we are] composed of world-class senior scientists and engineers
... [we] have advanced degrees in physics, mathematics, material sciences, and engineering
Doug |
