SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 48.74-0.1%1:48 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Richard Forsythe who wrote (3099)9/2/1996 4:38:00 PM
From: Craig M. Newmark   of 186894
 
Sorry, but your QWERTY story is nothing but a (popular) myth.

QWERTY was *not* designed to slow typists down. The layout has
not--so far, at least--been "easily improved upon". The ergonomics
literature suggests it might be possible to improve typing speed
about 5%, but even that increase is doubtful.

Standards are not randomly chosen nor irrevocable. All the arguments
used to assert invincibility for some standard are refuted by much
empirical evidence. Consider, for examples, Lotus 1-2-3 and
WordPerfect. (Or, for that matter, Wang word processing machines.)

Some references for the interested reader:

S. J. Liebowitz and Stephen E. Margolis, "The Fable of the Keys." Journal of Law and Economics, April 1990, pp. 1-26.
S. J. Liebowitz and Stephen E. Margolis, "Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy." Journal of Economic Perspectives, Spring 1994, pp. 133-150.

Craig M. Newmark
Associate Professor of Economics
North Carolina State University
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext