SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (6172)2/17/2009 6:04:36 PM
From: i-node2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
I don't think that's feasible. We might have done it differently, or not done it at all, had we known then what we know now. I wish we had. But we can't go home again. We can't undo the Ponzi paradigm we're in.

No, I agree. Not in any time frame you or I could appreciate, that's for sure.

But I think that the mistake Bush and others have made is to try to reverse something that is too embedded to be reversible.

Well, I don't know if it was a mistake to try. But this is the problem with these kinds of social programs. They tend to grow without bound because the political incentive is to increase benefits and expand the scope of the programs. Meanwhile, the political DIS-incentive to cut expenditures makes them politically untouchable.

This is why I have complained about Obama creating new entitlements with this stimulus program. Even small entitlements become big ones over time, and cannot under any circumstances be curtailed.

Today, we put maybe 8 Million people on the public dole for their health care, a figure which over time will undoubted double, triple and more. We're already broke due to Medicare. Bush added Part D, and for the life of me I don't know what he was thinking when he did it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext