American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (32970)	2/19/2009 2:56:17 PM
From: TimF	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 71588

No longer works to use this argument. Republicans could have if they had of held the Bush spending in check - now in my mind they hold no credibility. If a drunk tells you that drinking to much can cause problems, his general lack of credibility shouldn't be extended to the argument. If Bush spent like a drunk drinks, that doesn't mean that its a good idea for Obama to continue this practice, or that the argument should be ignored just because it comes from people who voted for Bush. Arguments are faulty, conclusions aren't false, just because of the person making them. And even if you want to focus solely on the person, well many of the people making the arguments now, also complained when Bush's spending spree continued past the first few years. why would anyone think that democrats after being out of power for almost all of the last 30 years That simply isn't the case. They have had the White House 10 of the last 30 years, and they have controlled either the Senate or the House, or both for the majority of those years.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next