SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: orkrious who wrote (185630)2/21/2009 5:41:52 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRead Replies (2) of 306849
 
Nationalization is a bit too imprecise, though, and it's a buzzword that's been tossed around. I agree that if Strangelove comes up with anything that seems like it might work, the market will respond favorably. Including a Buiter-Meredith Whitney kind of plan, ie, absorb the insolvent banks if they fail the stress test.... and liquidate the bad assets over time a la RTC. Then focus on capitalizing the survivors (without necessarily forcing them to take government funds in exchange for equity i.e, no broad nationalization). The sooner the better, IMO. This puts the bad liabilities on the taxpayers, but realistically they are there anyway. At least it quarantines them from the rest of the banking system, allowing it to function more freely. I think this will be a great deal more expensive than Buiter estimated though, probably multi-trillions instead of 350 billion, but that remains to be seen.

If something like this is implemented, you'd want to own the stocks of likely survivors ahead of the announcement. We should probably be trying to identify them as a potential speculative trade.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext