2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 399.01

+0.1%

Dec 19 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TobagoJack who wrote (46707)	2/22/2009 8:15:12 AM
From: dvdw©	Read Replies (2) of 218621

Need to resolve the contradictions here, spending within a MVRS, includes the logic of hindsight, which will raise doubts and force a renegotiation of the terms of sale; By way of your own example; If looks at past week the chinese have spent 10 bill in brazil for oil 25 bill in russia for oil 20 bill in australia for minerals 2 bill in aus for iron ore So not hard to spend 100 bill in a week. Now only 1,900 bill to go. The chinese used worthless paper from an array of supposedly worthless choices of paper. Problem is, hindsight provides a delayed awareness.......opening up the terms....better to break the trades entirely. like a fail to deliver in the market... lots of failures to deliver in exchange for paper will be the result of the delayed reaction as hindsight. Or.....else....what is sought and apparently bought.....can go ahead and be transferred.....because, the combined awareness of the alternative ruins everyone.....including the wannabee/gottabe right, operating against those who gotta be wrong.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next