SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (105004)2/26/2009 12:10:25 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 542598
 
If they have lower profits, they will still be investing. Even if they are not net investors (investing more than their existing capital stock depreciates), they are at the very least gross investors. That gross investment continues even if the net capital stock is shrinking, and a tax credit for it would help it to go further (for X amount of gross investment you get X+the benefit of the tax credit, in investment), and also help incentivise more of it (since the expected after tax return of the investment would be higher).

I'm not 100% sure I agree with Kling. I tend to support cuts in rates ahead of credits. They provide more of the incentive effect. But I suppose his argument is more for stimulus, while mine is more for the long term. You would get the credit right away (or at least at the end of the tax period) if you invest, which might have an effect of moving later investment up, and perhaps that's what he's going for.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext