SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tntpal who wrote (8401)3/5/2009 11:23:48 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 103300
 
Re: " I do not support the line item veto"

But --- if you oppose ENDLESS accumulation of federal debts... (& for the purposes of this discussion I'll assume you do unless you say you FAVOR higher and higher structural deficits and national debt) --- then HOW DO YOU PROPOSE to solve that problem?

For example: *I oppose* ever-higher national indebtedness.

And I believe that (in order of most utility) these THREE PROPOSALS stand the best chances of solving or at least greatly reducing the structural problem of endless debt accumulation:

1) Balance Budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

2) Line Item Veto power extended to the Presidency.

3) PAYGO budgeting rules adopted by the Congress.

I believe that #1 is BY FAR the most effective solution, and that the Balanced Budget amendment - combined with steady economic growth - hold the greatest hope for actually *solving* the massive problem.

(But that #2 and $3 can be of some small, but still useful, help... and so I see no reason to be against either.)

But... what do *you* propose for a "solution", tntpal?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext