Neither Moderate Nor Centrist
Peter Robinson, 03.06.09, 12:00 AM EST
How Buckley, Gergen and Brooks finally realized Barack Obama's left leanings.
"To see what is in front of one's nose," George Orwell famously asserted, "needs a constant struggle."
Congratulations this week to three journalists who have finally taken up that constant struggle: Christopher Buckley, David Gergen and David Brooks. All three used to insist that Obama was some species of centrist or moderate. Now that Obama has proposed the most massive expansion of government in the history of the republic, each has recognized that just conceivably he might have been mistaken.
A humorist--and, I should disclose, an old friend--Christopher Buckley exercised his acute comic sense during the presidential campaign, judging John McCain so thoroughly risible that the nation could hardly do worse by electing Barack Obama. Now Buckley has developed a sense of the tragic. In electing Obama, he admits, we may indeed have done worse--a lot worse.
"The strange thing," Buckley wrote last week after listening to Obama address Congress, "is that one feels almost unpatriotic, entertaining negative thoughts about Mr. Obama's grand plan. ... One thing is certain, however: Government is getting bigger and will stay bigger. Just remember ... that a government that is big enough to give you everything you want is also big enough to take it all away."
"Just remember"? Coming from someone who just remembered, the exhortation might strike a lot of people as rich. But never mind.
Now a commentator for CNN, David Gergen served in a number of administrations, first working in the White House all the way back in the 1970s. To the extent that he possesses any coherent ideological outlook--a fine question to ask of someone who took jobs from both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton--Gergen seems to share Alexander Hamilton's view that the federal government requires, as Hamilton expressed it, "energy in the executive."
During the campaign, Gergen praised Obama as a man of action. Now Gergen argues that Obama is displaying a little too much action.
"We are in the midst of a global crisis ... that demands intense focus and daily leadership by the president ...," Gergen wrote this past week. "But ... [Obama's] ... ambition for reforms in other areas do not allow him to give the economy his full attention." The financial industry is reeling, Gergen asserted, "because there is still no clearcut set of policies about how the government will rescue banks." And "it is stunning that Secretary Tim Geithner does not yet have a deputy secretary or any undersecretaries named, much less on the job."
Energy in the executive is one matter. Zealotry in the executive is another.
Two personalities inhabit New York Times columnist David Brooks, who, like Christopher Buckley, is a friend. One personality is that of the idealist. On Inauguration Day, the idealist in Brooks claimed that Barack Obama was "a pragmatist, an empiricist" who intended "to realize the end-of-ideology politics. ..." The other personality inhabiting Brooks is that of the realist. It takes a lot to rouse the realist. Trillions of dollars, in fact.
"There is evidence," Brooks wrote last week about Obama's $3.6 trillion budget, "of a party swept up in its own revolutionary fervor. ... We end up with deficits that are $1 trillion a year and stretch as far as the eye can see. ... [F]ederal spending as a share of GDP is zooming from its modern norm of 20% to an unacknowledged level somewhere far beyond
"Those of us who consider ourselves moderates--moderate-conservative, in my case--are forced to confront the reality that Barack Obama is not who we thought he was."...
forbes.com
...I think that there were a few other factors that drove the willingness of Brooks, Buckley, Gergen, et al., to believe that Obama was a moderate, despite all evidence to the contrary. First, Obama himself seems like he should be a political moderate because his personality comes across as so calm and moderate. Most people, whether far-right or far-left tend to have more extreme personalities as well. Obama doesn't come across as a radical bomb-thrower (remember Brooks's fawning profile of Obama's discussion of Niebuhr?). So there is a tendency to infer from Obama's calm personality that he is a moderate. Second, some of the ideas that are floating around (like new tax increases and aggressive regulation in the midst of a recession and unrestrained budget-busting spending) just seemed so implausible that I think there was a tendency to discount them as something that Obama simply wasn't serious about and that perhaps they were nothing more than political posturing. Turns out it looks like he was serious about them.
As I confessed back in the fall, until I really looked at his positions carefully (prompted by Sowell's comment) that Obama's extremism really sunk in to me. For those with more of a personal crush on Obama (or a desire to want to believe in him) it looks like it took a longer time for this to sink in.
volokh.com |
