SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Dierks who wrote (33984)3/12/2009 7:36:22 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Re: [ROTFL "can anyone recall when the FASB has been timely?] "No! They mull a rule change for a year. The new international standards are even worse than FASB."

AGREE that accounting rules changes move like molasses in winter.

And that the current, (& extremely urgent), problem of accurately assessing the true values of asset-backed securities is just too critical an issue to WAIT for the accounting bodies to agree on a *final* regulation (which likely could take as long as end of this year or mid-next-year before final ratification of the change happens....)

Re: " The best thing that could happen if Mauldin's analysis is close is for the Treasury, Federal Reserve and SEC to gang up and issue a few rules post haste."

SOMEBODY needs to crack a very BIG WHIP and accelerate this matter. The normal slow-motion is not adequate now.

(Perhaps the federal authorities could say to the accounting boards something like: You have *two weeks* to agree on the initial language for your rule change... and then we will put that in place, subject to final polishing and tweaking of the rule... which needs to then be rushed through final approval within three months....)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext