Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: KLP who wrote (296152)	3/12/2009 10:57:03 AM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) of 794035

My doctor has been using EMRs for about 5 years now. I'm wondering if it was mandated by Regence, and also suspect that she paid the price out of her pocket to update her records to electronic media. Personally, I think it's a great way to keep records, and I love the fact that I am allowed complete access from my computer. Of course what I object to is govt funding. She did in in her office without govt funding (I'll be sure to ask next time I'm in), so why can't others? Just another Nanny State intrusion imo. I don't think my doctor's fees are out of line, and I am billed at the insurer's base cost, which I assume is in line with other providers regardless of whether they've updated their system or not? I could be wrong!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next