Libertarian Discussion Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Doren who wrote (7608)	3/12/2009 5:45:50 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 13062

Torture. Semantics. I'll let others debate the actual torture issue, I'm interested in your "Semantics" reply. Its seems pointless to just reply "semantics" to a point or question. Yes obviously whether or not something qualifies as torture, or qualifies as any other word, is semantics. The whole issue is a semantic one. But "semantics" isn't an argument that you are right or they are wrong or that their point is worthless. Semantic points are rather important in many cases. If your going to ban say "assault with a deadly weapon", you have to define "assault", and "deadly weapon". If someone reasonable argues that his weapons aren't deadly, or his actions might not have been an assault, but rather something else, than perhaps he should be charged with another crime, or none at all. Its "semantics" but its the difference between a prison repentance and walking free. A dismissive "semantics" as if that was a either a counter argument or a reason to close down debate sounds like your saying the meaning of words is unimportant. But without an understanding of the meaning of what both sides are saying you can't even have a real debate.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next