SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The abortion issue: pro-choice vs. anti-abortion
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (152)3/13/2009 11:37:39 PM
From: LLCF1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 286
 
<but its either silly or intellectually dishonest to call them stating their position on the moral issue in question, a misrepresentation.>

But I'm not TALKING about their moral position... I'm talking about their statement about Obama and his actions... please either put some focus on my posts or don't answer them. It's rude to the thread to be fair.

<But if they believe every important point in their statement they are misrepresenting nothing.>

This is true, but it's far fetched to think the Catholic Church hasn't followed along on the particulars this issue, let alone Obama and Bush's orders... that statement is a misrepresentation except for someone completely shooting from the hip and heard a couple sentances on the radio.

<Assume arguendo, that their position on embryos is 100% correct. Than what would be misrepresented or incorrect about their statement? Nothing.>

As stated above that's the whole point... they said NOTHING about their position on embryo's. That's the point, they have given no context... (especially the fact that embyo's would be "killed" regardless of Obama's actions thru the actions of parents wanting invitro children).

<So it makes no sense to say they are misrepresenting things, unless you have very sold evidence that the person or people making the statements really don't hold the pro-life view about embryos and are just lying about it to gain some advantage.>

Again, you're not following the converstation. It's rude. Please dont' post to me if you can't follow along.

Again, I didn't post to you. Please post your own thoughts if you're not going to post relevant reply's to me. Thats's fine.

DAK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News