<No your point about funding is quite wrong. Yes congress votes the funds, but the president proposes a budget, and then signs the budget.>
No, it's quite right... Obama has NOTHING to do with proposing what type of research is promising or appropriate. You can keep asserting as much if you wish... since you are clearly locked into blaming him (Obama). In fact, if you read back, you have now gone back on your previous post after doing some rudimentary "face saving attempt" to knit pick on a superficial level having nothing to do with the issue at hand.
You know there are a LOT of good reasons NOT to have embryo's "killed", and it's easy to argue that they should not be "conceived" invitro... spiritual, common sense, and even scientific... but sadly your dogmatic, ignorant, egoic jousting doesn't help your cause at all.
<<Now your misrepresenting (or you where earlier)>>
It's the same thing I said in the first post... I guess you figure the new tact by you changes something? You've switched form pretending to understand the topic to: "no I'm not, you are"... you're child like tantrums are quite revealing to the motivation on the anti-steem cell argument. Thanks.
<That statement is true, and quite simply and obviously true. The research would involve destroying embryos to create stem cell lines.>
Again, getting off the MAIN topic. Obama is NOT responsible for the research... nor the "killing of human beings" as the piece claims. Not to mention the obvious inflamatory verbage given the fact that in the eye's of the law no one has, in fact, been killed.
<You where presenting yourself as so expert on the details of these funding restrictions, I thought you knew about their history.>>
I never, in any way represented myself as an expert... I'm simply flabbergasted that you (apparently) know NOTHING... and further just keep regurgitating that the same thing... nice try though... yea, you would have included all that inconvenient info if only you had known! LOL, I guess you could call me a "relative" expert... relative to you (apparently), who seems unable to discuss the context of the situation AT ALL. Wonder why..... well, actually, I don't.
<Also "No federal funding" is rather specific.>
If you handn't made so many previously evasive and tangential posts I'd think you were joking...
<But if you want some history of the issue...>
Yep... it's a long history. Nice of you to read a bit... would be nice if you'd use some information to deal with the issue I posted about rather than vague anti-abortion agenda that wasn't even my point.
Please post to the board as a whole and not me when you're going off on your own subject please.
I think the board get's it... you agree with the Catholic Church's statement that Obama is responsible for mass killings and I don't... I think it's an obvious misrepresentation and you don't. No problem there.
DAK |
