SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Bird's Nest

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: clutterer3/19/2009 1:28:08 PM
Read Replies (1) of 15232
 
"Merrill Lynch/BAM is out with some pretty harsh comments on Steels lowering their hot rolled coil price benchmarks given the continued fall in steel prices. Revised ’09 benchmark is now $475/ton, down from previous forecast of $600/ton. They are also revising their ’10 and ’11 forecasts to $550/ton (was $650/ton) and $600/ton (was $700/ton). Firm is now assuming a 55% utilization rate for the group in 2009, down from 65%.

One of the most hardest hit names in the sector is US Steel (NYSE:X):

Cut EPS outlook, uses of cash to exceed $1bb in 2009
Given the decline in benchmark pricing/operating rates they are lowering ’09E EPS to a $6.00 loss (was $2.00 loss) and revising down ’10E and ’11E EPS as well. US Steel has an undrawn $750mm revolver but liquidity is a near term concern as bank covenants could be tripped. In firm's view, US Steel is a prime candidate to issue equity and cut the dividend near term as it looks to bolster its liquidity position. Assuming reduced revolver access, they estimate the company is facing a $700mm funding gap this year.

Decreasing PO to $11
With EPS and EBITDA at negative levels this year, they value X based on 60% of tangible book value (in line with previous trough levels). This brings PO to $11 (was $24). Based on revised PO, they calculate 35%+ downside to X shares.

Highest conviction underperform call
Merrill maintains underperform view on US Steel given the company’s high fixed cost structure, automotive exposure, and liquidity issues. Profits in all segments are under pressure and they see further downside to Street consensus. In firm's view, 2009 losses should be comparable to those seen in the 2001-03 timeframe."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext