SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Naked Shorting-Hedge Fund & Market Maker manipulation?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: basserdan who wrote (4280)3/19/2009 1:40:27 PM
From: ogstel  Read Replies (1) of 5034
 
Okay, watched the vimeo video and thought it was great. Then, something else I had learned earlier came to me and I rewatched part.

The thing I remembered was from an option trading course. Basically, that the market makers in options will hedge the option trades they make. This would mean that they would be expected to short the number of shares that they had sold puts on. Given that the strike price was not being actively traded, I would not expect other put sellers to be involved.

So on the rewatch, it noted 5.7M shares were involved, but slightly disagreed by showing 55K options, which would indicated 5.5M shares. Later, Chris Dodd notes that the previous trading days showed 3M, 5M, 6M, 8M, 7M, and 2M shares being traded. That would make average trading volume for those days about 5.17M shares.

So, am I missing something? Would a market maker take a trade that that would, if they decided to hedge, take more than average daily volume? How do they balance the possibilities of "insane or know something"? Then, did they hedge, and was that the first jump of 2M or so failures? It seems like they would be well aware trying to hedge that many shares in a short time would be likely to significantly move the market.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext