SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 249.89+3.1%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (9636)10/26/1997 2:02:00 PM
From: William L. Oppenheim  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
I wonder if we are beginning to see PC saturation in the US. Sure, there is an insatiable need for semiconductors well into the future. But over the years I've bought lots of PC's. Now for the first time I am sitting with a p120 at home and a p200 at work, and neither is MMX and I, who can well afford another machine--really don't see the need to upgrade. There is little difference between the two, and most of what I now do as a consumer, I do on the internet and let the mainframes handle the details. For word processing, spreadsheets, email, personal accounting, and even slide presentations, I just don't need the latest and greatest any longer. I'll bet there are a lot of folks who feel like me. Why otherwise do we now have under $1000 computers replacing machines of only a year ago. In the past the machines stayed at about $2000-3000, but the features and power were upgraded in quantum leaps. No longer. Now the features expandto a lesser extent, but the prices come down. In my view, the same thing is going to happen to the high PE tech stock prices. Especially if the statement that 10% of chips go to that market is true.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext