SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (468065)4/1/2009 11:24:43 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) of 1574439
 
don't understand. Is the driver supposed to leave the train once the train is enroute?

...This is new....the last time I was in NYC was the mid 90s and there was no one holding open the doors. When did it start and why did it start?

Driver has a job of adjusting the speed, watching the lights. That job can pretty much be eliminated as well. They are running a pilot program on one line, where the driver just sits there and the train is being operated by the computer. But the whole thing is being stalled...

What I am talking about is the second person on the train, who is in the middle of the train and his only job is to open and close the doors. Kind of like the elevator man who used to open and close doors almost a century ago. So there are 2 people on each train, while in reality you need only 1 or 0.


That's your opinion. It does not mean that its the best and safest way to run a subway. You can't possibly know everything that is involved in running a subway but like my bro-in-law that won't stop you from griping.

You're blaming unions when you have no real proof they are the problem.

Low productivity, excessive wages, excessive benefits are the problem of MTA. Low productivity, excessive wages, excessive benefits and unions go hand in hand. So consider it proof positive.


Apparently, you've seen this in a report......can you give me a link to it? TIA.

People also blame the unions for GM's problems. I think GM's problems much like MTA's problems and go much deeper. The managers who are non union are not doing their job.

The managers are certainly not doing their job fighting the union in order to preserve the institutions they are managing. But that does not change the fact that the union is source of cancer, and if left unchecked, it will consume the body. Cancer cell hogs the resources available to the body. The more the cancer cells grow in size, number and power, the more resources they consume. Less and less resources are left for vital organs. In the end, the patient dies.

UAW represents a terminal case of cancer.


Because you grew up in a communist nation, you have a bias that borders on hysteria with certain subjects. Unions are one of those subjects. In any case, unions are not like cancer...they can be bad or good but they are not cancerous. Just like mgmt whch can be good or bad depending on the company. Please stop painting everything with a broad brush.

And one last thing......NYC does not run well. I find it nearly as inefficient as LA. It doesn't have to do with the unions but rather with the general attitude of the people and the overcrowding. Get out of NYC and you will save yourself considerable aggravation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext