SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tyc:> who wrote (64623)4/2/2009 10:29:21 AM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (2) of 78410
 
The question you have to ask yourself is would you restart any of the Timmins mines today given their historic characteristics?

You might say that Kinross 1060, Hallnor, McIntyre, Hollinger, Hoyle Pond, Bell Creek, Aunour, Broulan, Coniarum and Vipond would be a go because of their grade. Not spectacular when all was said and done despite the high contained ounces, but a go.
But you would get a lot of flack over getting the miners and mining methods. The people just are not there for underground mining anymore.

The Dome looked good when it started due to the high grade nature of the ground at surface, but if one looked today at the Pamour and the Dome's average grade in production would they say they wanted to do it all over again? Based on the standards of what makes a mine according to Bay street you would probably get turned down if you presented those stats. 0.10 oz/T for the Concerning the Pamour, no matter the width underground you would get a jaundiced stare from most money. 0.25 oz per ton over 200 tons per day? Not a going concern. You could not start it. Dome for most of its history was just that.

Are the broker's right? Or are they just expecting too much?

EC<:-}
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext