Donner Minerals (DML.V) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (564)	10/26/1997 7:16:00 PM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (2) of 11676

Hello Ed All that is probably true if you take MGJ at face value, but that doesn't explain the apparent discrepancy between what the Northen Miner says and what MGJ's NR says. Just for the sake of argument, lets presume that all these juniors are self serving and possibly even playing fast and loose with the truth. Lets face it, that would not take too much of a stretch of our imaginations, right? Following that line of logic, in theory, only Teck/DRZ public quotes, news releases and coroborating media publications, could be taken as truthful sources of information. (within reason) Given that assumption, would not Teck not now be drilling the centre of that gravity and magnetic high on the NAI/DRZ property as their NR said they were doing? Teck/DRZ NR - "Holes 67 and 75 are on the flank of a large NNE TRENDING GRAVITY ANOMOLY, WHICH IS INTERPRETED AS A POSSIBLE TROUGH OR DEPRESSION in the olivine gabbro intrusion." "Based on the similarity to Inco's Voisey's Bay deposit and nickel orebodies elsewhere, these results are considered extremely important. EXTENSIVE ADDITIONAL DRILLING IS UNDERWAY and a third drill rig has been mobilized to the project." How do we reliably know that they are doing anything else? I would want the MGJ/NM contradiction clarified before I placed any bets! Regards

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next