SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 223.47+4.3%Jan 2 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: fastpathguru who wrote (259391)4/3/2009 3:33:39 PM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Of course, it doesn't have to be official policy. It could just be ingrained in the corporate culture. Subtle, secretive (of course), systematic abuse of monopoly power.

It could also be mindbeams. Isn't that why you guys wear those tin foil hats, to deflect those Intel mind beams which fill your head with voices and impure thoughts?

true to form, you changed the subject away from the topic of the possibility of Intel wielding monopoly power

That wasn't the topic but I'll indulge you seeing as it seems to be so important to you. I am in no way a legal expert, self anointed or otherwise, but I think it is very likely that Intel wields monopoly power, at least as defined in most jurisdictions. Being a Monopoly isn't illegal, except maybe in the EU, we'll see. I also think that in all likelihood, Intel has conducted itself as if it is a Monopoly and avoided anything that would be illegal under those conditions. Historically Intel has needed AMD around to defray scrutiny but they may be becoming too much of a pain in the *ss to prop up much longer.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext