Your theory is that our dustbowls are the fertilizer for the ocean? I haven't seen white papers on that and that doesn't seem like the most plausible theory, because simpler ones exist.
For example, a theory I have read about is that as marine life dies and decomposes, it settles to the ocean floor, which is a lot colder and heavier than warm water closer to the surface. This decayed matter on the bottom of oceans is nutrient rich. Ocean circulation patterns are responsible for cool, nutrient rich water at the bottom of the ocean floor rising up and mixing with warm water at surface levels. As cool and warm water mix, the surface level ocean gets its dose of nutrients. Phytoplankton are known to be much more plentiful in nutrient rich waters. More phytoplankton help draw down CO2.
However, we know that excessive warming of oceans from rising temperatures disrupts normal ocean circulation patterns, which inhibits nutrient rich, cool water from rising to mix with warm water, which means less surface level nutrients in the oceans, which means less phytoplankton. So excessive CO2 seems to be having exactly the opposite effect that you'd think it would with phytoplankton.
Even otherwise benign substances can be malign in excessive quantities. CO2 is turning out to fit that category. All things must be kept in balance, even CO2. |
