SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum
MU 345.82+0.2%Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Carl R. who wrote (22981)10/26/1997 11:53:00 PM
From: Trey McAtee  Read Replies (3) of 53903
 
carl--

i appreciate your thoughts, but i must disagree. look at things this way...samsung and others are making mostly 64Mb now, and are probably making money on it...i dont care what CMP/techweb says, we have no real way of knowing. hell, we dont even know MUs exact costs.

when we reach transition, MU will be loosing a lot of money. however, samsung and the others will be making a mint. they might rack up 3-4 billion in profits on 64Mb, that will fund their production of 256Mb.
even though MU is the low cost producer, by the time they are in 64Mb the asians will be beating them on costs. granted, the situation will not hold up and MU will begin to overtake them on costs, but the fact remains..they will be in an extraordinary cash position when compared to MU. and you have to remember that part of what made MU so profitable this year (yeah, it wasnt much, but they did make money on ops) was asian inventory holdbacks. MU took advantage of this situation, and the japanese especially were not happy about it. i doubt they will be so generous next time.

asking why the company is still in business is moot. they are still in business because they have done just what is required of them. that is why i would not hold them up as an example of a quality american company. AND, with accelerating cost of building a wafer fab means that there is a very possibility that MU may not be in business in 5 years. however, i give this very slim odds<G>.of course, i answered my own question with what i just wrote. the stock is down because they have done just what is needed to stay in business.

with this line of posts i am not attempting to bait bulls, or bears. i want us to come together and make suggestions for solutions to the problems the company faces. my motive? simple, i want to be long MU, not short, and i want the long term value to make intels rise look paltry.however, these problems are not going to be easy to solve, and our suggestions will in all likelyhood be ignored by a management that is sadly lacking.

those you who are long are currently suffering from the boom bust cycle in the industry, although for MU it is a somewhat more dramatic. is this the reason for the stocks swings over time? yes. the sad thing is that it is avoidable. there is no reason the company should be doing this badly.

good luck to all,
trey
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext