SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation
CRSP 56.68-2.4%Dec 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL who wrote (30881)4/10/2009 1:10:48 PM
From: Ian@SI1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 52153
 
RE my 23andme comment: ... this is version 1. I suspect that it will evolve into a useful diagnostic tool;...

I had intended to say PREVENTION tool. Even today, should one know of a genetic predisposition, it's possible to take preventive steps to minimize the risk.

RE negative Vitamin D PR. I don't trust the researcher's motives. He opens by stating that 75% of Americans are deficient; then makes the erroneous statement that partial skin exposure to the sun for 10 minutes 3 days weekly is enough for anyone completely ignoring the fact that for most of the year, most Americans are not at a latitude where sunlight will cause the skin to produce Vit D.

There's a multinational task force reviewing the current Vitamin D dosage recommendation and limits. There's a massive body of evidence that it should be raised. This is the most negative view I've ever seen. As such it's an outlier. On the other hand, I'm probably an outlier on the Pro Vit D side.

Happy Easter all,
Ian
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext