Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (470426)	4/10/2009 4:03:31 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 1573956

Yes it would be important if that was what happened. But it wasn't. It is still important that they are having this dispute though. "Stevens said Palin’s account of events “is absolutely false.” Stevens said the statement was false, he didn't say Palin lied. The statement may be false, I don't know. We now have differing versions of the circumstance. Even if the statement turns out to be false, Palin may not have intended to deceive her audience. The intention to deceive is fundamental to being a liar. There could be any number of valid reasons why Palin would have the wrong information or why her statement was wrong with out her having intended to lie. And Stevens might have gotten it wrong. We need more. People speculate, or guess about causes and get things wrong. That's poor judgement for a public official but its not lying. Someone else may have explained it to her that way, going on the information she has is not lying. Although she should correct it if she finds out a mistake has been made. I would need more information before passing judgement. I know you don't, but we both know it isn't because of your ethics.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next