2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 368.29

+0.6%

Nov 7 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: KyrosL who wrote (48465)	4/12/2009 4:48:14 AM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 217579

Let's not get carried away Kyros. <TJ, elmat, Mq all agree > I just came up with a way in which the situation MIGHT be argued as being a good thing, in the long run, [but not for the loser guys whose DNA is not long for this world]. I suspect it's a bad thing with violent aggression being the outcome, most likely turned inwardly given the problems of external wars these days. It's not like the olden days when the bosses in the cities could press gang the legions of spare young males, put them in uniform, point them over the horizon and say "sic 'em". 32 million spare young males roaming the streets of China could be a bit of a problem. Given the mating rituals of humans, it's actually more like 40 million or 50 million spare young males because many women would rather go without than accept third rate blokes. It's part of nature's eugenics strategy. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next