TJ, you are so stone age, continuing to believe in racist territorial alpha male dominance hierarchy conquistador confiscatory processes. You must be closely related to chimps who take the same approach. Yes, the USA could "take out" NZ any time they like to do so, but they already have us. <do you actually believe there would be consequences, when chips are down, for taking out the likes of nz by any and all natural means? >
China could do so too and that is no doubt what you meant. But the USA considers NZ already their possession so China would find the takeover process difficult tending towards impossible and no doubt suicidal. The bosses or China aren't totally retarded so they no doubt understand that taking it over is pointless and it's better to do as they have been doing for a couple of decades = gaining ground economically and thereby in other respects.
Rather than such stupid "thinking" they would do best to shelve their dopey TD-SCDMA and be Gung Ho on CDMA/OFDMA 450,700,800MHz mobile cyberspace.
Women do the eugenics job and while they measure intelligence, it's in a more sophisticated way than simplistic SAT scores. <w/r to your mentioned eugenics, will it be based on sat test scores or population count as a measure of success?>
Population count is normally of some importance but as Alan Green$pan KBE explained, we know we were in a bubble AFTER the bubble has popped. So, numbers don't necessarily demonstrate success though they often do. What matters is who is alive to stand atop the Roman ruins 2000 years later. I was and I saw a photo of you. Ants also are there though less conspicuous. So ants, you, me and a LOT of other living things are the winners, so far. We must check scores in another 2000 years and then we will know what was good eugenics process and what was not.
Mqurice |
