2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 368.29

+0.6%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TobagoJack who wrote (48602)	4/15/2009 5:10:13 AM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) of 217569

TJ, you have tenses confused. <w/r to your mentioned eugenics, will it be based on sat test scores or population count as a measure of success?> The eugenics process is not a matter of will be, it is a matter of is. To save you the effort of clicking all the way back upstream, for ease of reference: <Women do the eugenics job and while they measure intelligence, it's in a more sophisticated way than simplistic SAT scores> That looks as though it says that SAT score is not the primary or even a significant unit of measure. Success is a matter of ipso facto and as explained, is a matter of who is alive in 100, 1000, million years and as with irrational exuberance, we find out AFTER the event whether it was or wasn't good eugenics that the women were doing. I'm not sure that you have always answered my questions with close attention, or even any attention. Mqurice PS: Out of curiosity, I asked Google and there are many links. One is: books.google.co.nz

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next