IPIC Message Board - Msg: 2558489

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : IPIC

IPIC 0.0001000

0.0%

Aug 15 3:35 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Todd N. Weisrock who wrote (840)	10/27/1997 11:19:00 AM
From: sds	Read Replies (1) of 1359

Todd: Probably not a whole lot... The big distinction here is whether or not the co.'s lose these suits. For IPIC, it will be interesting to see how the case pans out. If IPIC knew about these side-effects and hid them, that's one thing. If IPIC didn't know, but is still held to be liable, that could have huge ramifications. Imagine if every b-tech/pharma had to operate under the onus that they would be held responsible for every bad outcome, regardless of whether or not the label listed it as a possible occurance. Let's hope that IPIC wins this (or turns out to be guilty of fraud and misrepresentation). If, however, the ruling is that IPIC DIDN'T know, but IS still liable for sideffects they didn't know about; then look out for all biotechs.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next