Evolution Message Board - Msg: 25587169

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LLCF who wrote (2541)	4/21/2009 6:53:08 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) of 69300

You are simply equivocating on the word "evolution". No one disputes that change happens. It's the kind of change that is in question in the evolutionary debate "we see change everywhere it is literally PERVASIVE in everything we sense and experience" Really: do we see non life suddenly evolving into life? Spontaneous generation? If not: Why not? Do we see in the fossil record, long, gradual changes from one species to another? No instead we get served up finch beaks, peppered moths and Haeckel’s fraudulent drawings. Then there's Piltdown man, Nebraska man, and even flipperpithecus. Would you buy a used fossil from these guys? Again; If Darwinian evolution is true; then why is it not reflected in the fossil record? There is a dramatic lack of intermediate forms in the fossil record where there should be myriads of examples. The huge gaps between the few examples that are cited and existing species, render the connections draw tenuous at best. Even more embarassing is when fossils are discovered to be alive and well What we do see, are relatively trivial changes within already established species. We don't see Darwinian evolution happening.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next