THE WHITE HOUSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE

SPY 677.48

+0.3%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gersh Avery who wrote (25513)	4/23/2009 5:29:36 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) of 25737

Re: "The new policy is supposed to be that federal laws will only be applied when state law has been violated. The DOJ claims this case fits. No evidence about CA state law was introduced. None was allowed." A most peculiar argument. How can they claim that a 'state law was violated' WITHOUT even naming what law? (And... if a state law had been violated, and that were the only legal violation... wouldn't a state court be the proper venue for the prosecution?)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next