Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (7456)	4/23/2009 11:39:07 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) of 86356

My son in law teaches physics and climatology and I do not know what else. He is primarily a teacher. He gets paid to teach. Is that legitimate? Work he does on global warming he does as an aside to his teaching. His primary research the last couple of years involves gas isotopes. His concentration recently was on how formaldahyde forms in the atmosphere. Which he figured out; and for which he has acheived worldwide acclaim, as noted by his being invited to Vienna (fully paid) to give his paper before a group of his peers. He is there right now. Did Einstein do his work for money? Money is the last thing my son in law thinks of. I never remember you being such an ugly person Bob. What happened to you? >> I owe you or your SIL no apology. He has profited from GW or your claim for being recruited to a major university is false. Your claims on this guy are years years years old. How long has he had his current job? How much of his work is GW? I again ask - how much influence is there of money on he and other scare artists? BTW - I never accused him of lying - only profiterring! Again - what influence does money have on his positions? He would resign with an epiphany? How likely is such an epiphany? Would his job disappear? What other classes does he teach? Is GW an amusement for him or his major source of income? I hold the whole community of GW alarmists as suspect as to their motives. Charles - the story is old and tired. It has not changed in years. What are the current facts? The whole group of GW alarmists owe us an honest appraisal of how they would change the world to achieve their goals. Are they no nuke no how alarmists? Or are they simply scare us for whatever? Bob<

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next